
Sovrano o Tiranno? Il Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima de Pedro Luis Farnesio
Silvia Toppetta
- Pagine: 5-30
- Prezzo: 7,00 €
- Rivista: Dimensioni e problemi della ricerca storica
- Fascicolo: 2/2018 – Dimensioni e problemi della ricerca storica
- DOI: 10.7376/92950
In breve
Keywords: sovereignty, tyranny, Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, Pier Luigi Farnese, Nicolò Machiavelli.
This article focuses on some crucial aspects of a satirical text of the sixteenth century, the "Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima" de Pedro Luis Farnesio, which had a high circulation both in Italian and Spanish circles. The author of the dialogue, probably the diplomat Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, describes the conspiracy of Piacenza (1547) from an anti-farnesian and anti-papal point of view, setting it in a perspective of pro-imperial propaganda. This way opens up a new horizon and wanders from the local background, both politically and culturally. Therefore, we are in the middle of a debate on the theme of sovereignty and its possible degeneration into tyranny. The article gives a Machiavellian reading of the text, comparing extracts of the "Principe" and of the dialogue to analyze Pier Luigi Farnese's government action in a way which goes beyond the "topos" of the tyrant.
Keywords: sovereignty, tyranny, Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, Pier Luigi Farnese, Nicolò Machiavelli.
This article focuses on some crucial aspects of a satirical text of the sixteenth century, the "Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima" de Pedro Luis Farnesio, which had a high circulation both [...]

Sovereign or tyrant? The Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima de Pedro Luis Farnesio / Sovrano o Tiranno? Il Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima de Pedro Luis Farnesio
Silvia Toppetta
- Pagine: 5-30
- Prezzo: 7,00 €
- DOI: 10.7376/92950
In breve
Keywords: sovereignty, tyranny, Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, Pier Luigi Farnese, Nicolò Machiavelli.
This article focuses on some crucial aspects of a satirical text of the sixteenth century, the "Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima" de Pedro Luis Farnesio, which had a high circulation both in Italian and Spanish circles. The author of the dialogue, probably the diplomat Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, describes the conspiracy of Piacenza (1547) from an anti-farnesian and anti-papal point of view, setting it in a perspective of pro-imperial propaganda. This way opens up a new horizon and wanders from the local background, both politically and culturally. Therefore, we are in the middle of a debate on the theme of sovereignty and its possible degeneration into tyranny. The article gives a Machiavellian reading of the text, comparing extracts of the "Principe" and of the dialogue to analyze Pier Luigi Farnese's government action in a way which goes beyond the "topos" of the tyrant.
Keywords: sovereignty, tyranny, Diego Hurtado de Mendoza, Pier Luigi Farnese, Nicolò Machiavelli.
This article focuses on some crucial aspects of a satirical text of the sixteenth century, the "Diálogo entre Caronte y el ánima" de Pedro Luis Farnesio, which had a high circulation both [...]