Diritto o violenza. L’impossibile legalizzazione della tortura

Marina Lalatta Costerbosa

  • Pagine:   19-34
  • Prezzo:   7,00 
  • Rivista:   Studi sulla questione criminale
  • Fascicolo:   2/2018 – Studi sulla questione criminale
  • DOI:   10.7383/90996
In breve

This essay focuses on the recent debate on re-legalizing torture in the context of the so-called “war on terrorism”. The A. tries to show the political incoherence and the theoretical impossibility of such an aim. The paper moves from an articulate defini­tion of torture, which considers it as the cruel and extreme expression of the «inten­tion of harming» in a structured system. It takes into account the different moral and political arguments supporting torture inside democratic States today. Through this argumentation method, it stresses their incompatibility with fundamental principles of constitutional democracy and, with regard to both the victims and the principle of justice, it defends the basic need of its adequate condemnation expressed by demo­cratic societies and public opinion.

This essay focuses on the recent debate on re-legalizing torture in the context of the so-called “war on terrorism”. The A. tries to show the political incoherence and the theoretical impossibility of such an aim. The paper moves from an articulate defini­tion of torture, [...]

Law and Violence. The Impossibility of Legalizing Torture / Diritto o violenza. L’impossibile legalizzazione della tortura

Marina Lalatta Costerbosa

  • Pagine:   19-34
  • Prezzo:   7,00 
  • DOI:   10.7383/90996
In breve

This essay focuses on the recent debate on re-legalizing torture in the context of the so-called “war on terrorism”. The A. tries to show the political incoherence and the theoretical impossibility of such an aim. The paper moves from an articulate defini­tion of torture, which considers it as the cruel and extreme expression of the «inten­tion of harming» in a structured system. It takes into account the different moral and political arguments supporting torture inside democratic States today. Through this argumentation method, it stresses their incompatibility with fundamental principles of constitutional democracy and, with regard to both the victims and the principle of justice, it defends the basic need of its adequate condemnation expressed by demo­cratic societies and public opinion.

This essay focuses on the recent debate on re-legalizing torture in the context of the so-called “war on terrorism”. The A. tries to show the political incoherence and the theoretical impossibility of such an aim. The paper moves from an articulate defini­tion of torture, [...]